Formal layer
Recursive states, projected phase variables, action norm, exposure, accumulated loss, exposure-gate transmissions, survival weights, and normalised representation.
Chapter 1
Companion to the RSG v1.4 protocol paper
This chapter is the live companion to Recursive Survival Weighting in Layered Media: A Conditional Formalism and Locked Analogue Test Protocol. It keeps the core move visible: RSG first generates histories, then filters them by accumulated survival loss, and only then reads the normalised remainder as represented structure.
The developed empirical claim in RSG v1.4 is narrow. It is a controlled analogue-media output prediction. Astrophysical, electromagnetic, matter-sector, cosmological, and vacuum-energy discussions are bridge programmes unless separately specified and tested.
This matters because the same notation can be used in three different ways: as an internal definition, as a conditional bridge, or as a measured claim. The live chapters keep those layers apart so the visualisation stays useful without pretending to be validation data.
strict empirical target:
locked analogue output fractions and log-ratios
match precomputed accumulated-loss differences
within preregistered uncertainty
The v1.4 paper is deliberately layered. It gives a strict formal core, one locked analogue-test route, and then a separate bridge roadmap. Reading the page this way prevents the future physical applications from being mistaken for results already established by the survival-normalisation lemma.
Recursive states, projected phase variables, action norm, exposure, accumulated loss, exposure-gate transmissions, survival weights, and normalised representation.
A specified update map, measured phase convention, calibrated loss, path family, output map, detector floors, and failure thresholds.
Lorentzian interval representation, matter-sector readings, cosmological exchange, and vacuum-energy comparisons.
Only the locked analogue comparison is the developed empirical claim in this paper.
Reduced-model lock. The projected equations, the norm
J, and the exposure law W are reduced-model structures
for a constrained analogue protocol. They are not claimed as universal
dynamics until a separate bridge supplies variables, constants, and falsifiers.
The basic object is not a bare particle and not a smooth spacetime point. It is a structured recursive state carrying four pieces: topological support, projected phase or transport data, measure data, and survival weight.
\sigma_n = (X_n, \phi_n, \mu_n, S_n)
Topological support: the objecthood or carrier layer, later connected to Surtea-style interior, closure, boundary, and class.
Projected phase or transport data: the reduced coordinates used for path generation, bending, exposure, and visual readout.
Measure package: physical or diagnostic quantities such as frequency, mass-equivalent measure, redshift index, or detector readout.
Survival weight: the persistence carried by the state before normalisation into represented measure.
The paper starts from a recursive update. Continuous equations are allowed only as projected approximations or local-flow embeddings of a specified step. If the continuous flow is chosen after the desired output is known, it has no predictive content.
\sigma_{n+1} = R(\sigma_n)
\pi_\Phi : \Sigma -> \Phi
\pi_\Phi(\sigma_n) = \phi_n
The visualisation uses this distinction constantly. The canvas shows smooth curves, waves, and fields because they are readable, but the conceptual engine is a stepwise generation-filter-normalise loop.
y_{n+1} = F_{Delta t,n}(y_n)
y_{n+1} = M_n y_n + O(||y_n||^2)
M_n = exp(Delta t A_n) + O(Delta t^2)
In other words, a local ODE is allowed when it faithfully summarises locked step data. It is not allowed to become a smooth curve chosen after the output has been seen.
A history is a generated sequence of structured states. RSG does not begin by declaring one history real and all others irrelevant. It generates a family, assigns accumulated loss, and then asks which histories remain represented.
\gamma_i = (\sigma_{i,0}, \sigma_{i,1}, \sigma_{i,2}, ...)
A candidate path is allowed by the recursive update and projection.
The path has a large exposure-gate transmission G_i = S_i = exp(-A_i) after accumulated loss.
The path receives normalised weight after comparison with the other surviving histories.
In an analogue test, represented output must be estimated by a declared detector convention.
The common reduced phase picture uses a position-like coordinate and a motion-like coordinate. These are model coordinates. In a test, they must be operationally defined before output comparison.
\phi_n = (\Theta_n, \Pi_n)
In a continuous projected approximation, a locally constant positive phase-flow cell can be represented by oscillator-like equations:
d\Theta/dt = \Pi
d\Pi/dt = -\Omega^2 \Theta
The coefficient \Omega^2 creates curvature-like bending in this reduced
phase portrait. The PDF is careful here: this is not automatically a spacetime
curvature invariant.
Omega^2 > 0 -> oscillator-like phase rotation
Omega^2 = 0 -> free linear phase motion
Omega^2 < 0 -> hyperbolic projected cell
For a locally constant, lossless cell, E = 1/2(Pi^2 + Omega^2 Theta^2)
is conserved. With variable Omega^2, the same expression is a local
diagnostic unless an extended invariant is supplied.
RSG v1.4 distinguishes transport behaviours by recurrence, closure, projected norm preservation, and effective loss. The live visualisation turns those classes into readable modes.
Effectively lossless, projected-norm-preserving transport with no recurrent internal clock, hence zero recursive proper time.
Histories with differential effective loss concentrate represented measure into narrower basins.
Support class, boundary stability, or preserved closure can help a history persist.
Optical, cosmological, matter-sector, or vacuum-sector readings remain conditional until calibrated.
Gamma W -> 0
||sigma_{n+1}||_Phi = ||sigma_n||_Phi
no recurrent internal clock -> d tau_R = 0
The null-interval result is conditional. Under an imported local Lorentzian
interval calibration, d tau_R = 0 is represented by ds^2 = 0.
The metric signature, the value of c, and electromagnetic field structure
are not derived by the survival-normalisation lemma.
RSG v1.4 does not report a completed lab validation. It also does not derive Maxwell's equations, gauge structure, photon polarisation, matter formation, a universal astrophysical loss law, or the cosmological constant. Those topics remain bridge programmes until they supply their own fixed variables, constants, maps, and falsifiers.
Lambda_surv = Gamma W
Lambda_surv is not Lambda_CC
without a dimensional map, conservation law, and equation of state