Interior
Stable support that belongs cleanly to the object or local region.
Chapter 4
The Surtea layer supplies the support language behind the visualisation: partition, interior, closure, boundary, class, and interaction. In RSG, this tells us what kind of topological support a surviving history is carried by.
The core RSG formalism can discuss histories, phase projection, loss, and survival. The Surtea bridge adds a question underneath that: what is the support that a history is carried on? Without a support language, closure, boundary instability, and objecthood remain visually intuitive but formally vague.
The simplified reading begins with a non-empty set M and a partition
D. The partition elements are disjoint non-empty pieces whose union is
the whole set.
U = (M, D)
M != empty
D is a partition of M
The visualisation turns this into cells. The cells are not just decoration: they are a readable version of partitioned support.
The most portable Surtea-style diagnostics are interior, closure, and boundary. These are the terms the live site uses when it colours topology cells.
int_D(X) = interior of X in the D-topology
cl_D(X) = closure of X in the D-topology
bd_D(X) = cl_D(X) \ int_D(X)
Stable support that belongs cleanly to the object or local region.
The active edge where membership, class, or interaction can change.
Support pulled into the represented object by the topology.
A coarse objecthood type used when histories are grouped by support behaviour.
RSG can treat boundary change, class change, and interaction instability as survival-relevant. This does not mean topology becomes a force. It means the support grammar contributes to the loss functional when a model chooses to include it.
S_{n+1} = S_n exp(-L_D Delta t)
L_D = lambda W
+ alpha Delta_bd
+ beta Delta_class
+ chi Delta_int
In the canvas, Surtea cells have three practical meanings:
Topology heat makes the partition finer and more restless. Closure bias makes open paths more willing to curl, recur, thicken, or form record-like persistence.
The Surtea layer is a support grammar. It helps describe objecthood and boundary behaviour in the RSG site, but it does not by itself validate the survival-weighting formalism or any physical bridge. A model must still specify how topological diagnostics affect measured loss or output.